Feed on
Posts
Comments

Here are few pictures of the Tree of Prosperity at the Wynn casino of Macau. It is a very impressive piece of technology, but more interestingly, it merges various purposes and cultural influences into one big display. It mixes Western and Chinese astrological symbols, a tree made of gold and many visual effects in a show designed to ‘thrill and excite’ the visitors of the casino. Many people come in to see the tree, which is already a big success. But the tree does more than simply attracting visitors, they throw money to the golden tree in the hope it will make them luckier in their gambling, which validates its symbolical value. It is interesting because the show is a big patchwork of symbols, some traditional, some invented, and they manifestly deliver all together a message that the audience can understand. A simple hole could have achieved the same function of course, and people would have also thrown money in it. But the massive scale of the tree of prosperity is also designed to showcase the power of gold and money, to make people desire prosperity beyond what is ordinary. If not, the Wynn casino would have no point. The tree works exactly like a religious temple dedicated to prosperity and luck. It seems all natural and appropriate inside the casino; this is why the tree is worshipped. What I like is that it doesn’t lie about anything. The message is bold and universal. I’m sure that gamblers appreciate this way to wish them good luck during their visit to the Wynn casino.

A giant futuristic screen opens on the ceiling.

The screens open and a giant chandelier appears above.

A tree made of gold then appears from below the ground.

The whole forms a moving sculpture dedicated to prosperity.

By the way, this is the sign outside of the Wynn casino and hotel. It mixes Chinese, American and French elements, and is situated on a former Portuguese territory. What a world!

  • Share/Bookmark

Here are few pictures of Macau and its casinos. The place lost its appearance from the 19th and even 20th century. Found guilty: the massive arrival of new casinos, the construction of the airport and the merger of the Taipa and Coloane islands. You can still find very nicely preserved Portuguese buildings in Macau though, and not all casinos are tasteless. In fact, the distinction between the old and the fake is not always so clear here. Casinos are after all part of the history of Macau. So, I wonder, what is the most authentic? Macau or Las Vegas? I know that the question is pointless anyway because I don’t believe in the word ‘authentic’. But still, I had the feeling that Macau had more depth than Las Vegas, even though Las Vegas remains much more impressive.

Ok, this entertainment complex is clearly fake and tasteless.

Here are some nice Portuguese ceramic tiles on a concrete building.

The Lisboa casino dates from the 60s. Its retro architecture is refreshing and its name is directly related to the history of Macau.

Its recent extension, the Grand Lisboa looks more like a building coming from space, and the inside is not so interesting.

Here is a view of Macau mixing old and new.

Macau is not only about Portuguese vestiges, you can also find some nice examples of Chinese architecture, such as in the A-Ma temple. Its history is by the way wonderfully illustrated in the Maritime museum just next door.

I like the way they restored the St Dominic’s Church, they kept its relative simplicity.

Here is the Venetian casino and hotel in Macau, similar to the one in Las Vegas, but bigger. The one in Las Vegas is still a little better I think; its sections are a little more diverse. It is a fake reproduction of Venice of course, and its theme has not any connection with Macau, at the opposite of the Lisboa casino. It features however an amazing number of details that reproduce relatively faithfully the ones in Venice. The entertainments inside the casino such as opera acts and classical music are of good quality and not fake at all. I’m not saying it is like Venice, but it is not a totally fake place.

If you are interested in the idea of travelling in fake places, you can also check out the artistic video I did a while ago about Las Vegas..

  • Share/Bookmark

I visited Hong Kong Disneyland the other day. It was not without any resistance as the park has not the reputation of being the best of its kind. But it was only 20 minutes away by public transport and I’m a specialist in theme parks after all, so I could not resist and did my duty.

The park was definitely lacking a level of details in the execution of the themed areas. The budget was too tight it seems. It was nowhere more apparent than on Main Street USA and the Disney castle. The buildings were smaller than in other Disney parks and didn’t have enough details; some looked as cheap as in second class parks.

However, the excitement of the crowd was visible. That along with the Disney train similar to the one of Disney Tokyo and the soundtrack at the entrance gate was enough to put me into the ‘Disney’ mood.

There were a minimum of attractions in Hong Kong Disneyland. I thought it would not be enough to entertain me for a whole day but their choice was actually quite good. The attractions were also slightly adapted to feature more Disney characters and to compensate the lack of classical rides such as Pinocchio.  It was very interesting to see how this Disney Park relies more than any others on symbolism, sometimes only materialized by very simple blocks of concrete. It is a very risky game though, and even if I think they managed to make this park work for now, they should be careful to invest enough if they want to preserve the ‘magic’ of their brand.

Three new massive sections were also under construction and will surely help raise the overall level of the park. Here is a picture from the Tarzan’s tree house of what I think will be the Grizzly trail.

Hong Kong Disneyland is the only one to tolerate natural intrusions in its landscape but I think that seeing the mounts behind the castle works quite well.

I loved the space mountain, the queue was very basic but it’s the first time I tried a revamped version of the ride. The soundtrack adds more to the experience than in any other rides, adding even maybe a little of derision to the theme of space invasion from the 60s. The tempo of the ride and of its special effects is absolutely perfect.

Tomorrowland

This was the advantage of having many Indian visitors to the park, good Indian vegetarian food! I also understood why they decided to build a second park in Shanghai. This one seems to be targeting people from Hong Kong, but also people from Philippines, Indonesia, Singapore and other countries in the region. I guess that the one in Shanghai will target visitors from mainland China.

Adventureland

The jungle river cruise

Tarzan's tree house

“It’s a small world” has been relatively heavily adapted. As I mentioned earlier, they added many Disney characters in the ride, I guess to compensate the size of the park, and maybe even to ‘educate’ the audience. But I can’t stop wondering if it is not also because Disney characters have now succeeded to invade our “small world”. New sections have also been added I think, like the rainforest one, the general feeling is more oriented towards nature and environmental awareness.

This picture is a little blurry but I like it because it shows the many digital cameras. I know that Hong Kong Disneyland did not provide initially enough picture opportunities to the local audience, but they seem to have done a good job at improving that part. I don’t know why, but they put forward characters from Toy Story, Stitch and other more recent films here, probably the conclusion of some clever customer segmentation and marketing studies.

If you want to read more about the subject, check out my other posts on theme parks or my analysis on the heterotopia of Walt Disney World.

  • Share/Bookmark

I read about world fairs and utopias while I was curating the Dreams of Progress exhibition last year. A utopia, or a heterotopia such as the world expo, always features inconsistencies or misconceptions. If not, the utopia could be achieved and it would not be a utopia anymore. However, never the inconsistencies of today’s world appeared to me clearer than on the Shanghai World Expo.

The “Better city, better life” official theme of the Shanghai World Fair was an excellent choice. It encapsulated all that needs to be addressed nowadays: sustainability, globalisation, urbanisation, fairness between the poor and the rich. The right questions were asked. However, the states and corporations present at the expo showed how unconvincing their answers were. Their self-interest and reliance on established industries lead them to the most desperate and risible rhetoric, see my previous posts for some examples.

The solution to all our problems is technology according to the participants of the Expo. Yet, and as far as I know, none of the big pavilions had an absolute zero impact on the environment. Instead, a splash of energetically very demanding presentations explained to the audience that some symbolic features of the buildings were sustainable, a non-sense.

Throughout my visit, oil companies, car manufacturers, heavy industries told me that their technology will bring soon a solution to the challenges that the world is facing. And the only role of the national pavilions was to repeat the absurd solutions that their biggest industries had to sell. How lower a national self-esteem could be?

The best place to experience these contradictions was in the area of the Expo devoted to industries. There, I was being told that I will have a better life thanks to bigger boats, more oil and concept GM cars; Answers that were totally inadequate and only increased my feeling of insecurity. To be fair, there were some good intentions and ideas at the Expo, and technology is surely part of the solution. But they were squeezed in an absurd vision serving national and supranational short-term interests.

The China State Shipbuilding Corporation believes that a better future resides in bigger boats.

I like and don’t like the CSSC building, it is a very interesting combination of industrial and ship structures that forms a building intended for leisure.

Using this mobile device, you choose and collect your dreams, which are in fact products. I wonder what they will do with the data?

In the Shanghai pavilion, you clap your hands to produce energy. These kind of interactions work very well with the Chinese audience, but are symbolic and full of contradictions (clapping my hands was surely not enough to pay the bill of electricity for the pavilion).

The pavilion of Future is a good illustration of the word ‘uncanny’, it is huge and tries to promote a better future with a big exhibition budget. The result is cold, technological and full of white anonymous bodies.

In his book, Jay Winter explained how the Paris World Fair of 1937 was a desperate invocation of the illuminations of technology to prevent another war. Reality was not long to impose itself. Let’s hope that history will give us more time to resolve our incapacity to face limited resources on earth.

  • Share/Bookmark

As for all Expos, most of the pavilions will be destroyed at the end of the event. Only few will remain, here are some of them.

These buildings are huge and cold. Partly because they will need to accommodate a huge number of visitors, but still, I don’t think they incarnate the ‘better city, better life’ theme of the Expo at all. Except maybe few green credentials, which seem to me like drops of water compared to the massive use of electricity in the Expo, how would life be better in these massive buildings? The Chinese pavilion looks like it is overlooking the crowd outside. The Theme pavilion feels like an unfriendly fortress.

See my other posts on the Shanghai World Expo.

  • Share/Bookmark

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »